User Tools

Site Tools


instructional_design:structural_learning

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
instructional_design:structural_learning [2011/03/16 10:48]
jpetrovic [What is structural learning theory?]
instructional_design:structural_learning [2023/06/19 18:03] (current)
Line 11: Line 11:
 Structural learning theory suggests that structures (problems) that a learner must learn, need to be formed as **rules** performed on a **domain**. Structural learning theory suggests that structures (problems) that a learner must learn, need to be formed as **rules** performed on a **domain**.
  
-A domain here is defined as a set of characterizing **inputs** and **outputs**. Inputs and outputs can be anything, even a process, an idea or a concept. For example: list of verbs (input) -> present participles (output).+A domain here is defined as a set of characterizing **inputs** and **outputs**. Inputs and outputs can be anything, even a process, an idea or a concept. For example: 
 + 
 +  * list of verbs (input) -> present participles (output).
  
 Operations performed on given inputs are called rules, and they generate unique outputs. Rules can contain different levels of abstraction and are always defined with three parameters: Operations performed on given inputs are called rules, and they generate unique outputs. Rules can contain different levels of abstraction and are always defined with three parameters:
Line 23: Line 25:
 Rules can be simplified into **lower-order rules** (//atomic components//​) which represent most basic concepts learner needs to know when dealing with a problem from given domain. By combining these atomic components and application of more complicated to lower order rules new **higher-order rules** are derived. Higher-order rules are rules which can have other rules as inputs or outputs (for example mathematical theorems) and they can be used to solve complex problems in the whole domain. Rules can be simplified into **lower-order rules** (//atomic components//​) which represent most basic concepts learner needs to know when dealing with a problem from given domain. By combining these atomic components and application of more complicated to lower order rules new **higher-order rules** are derived. Higher-order rules are rules which can have other rules as inputs or outputs (for example mathematical theorems) and they can be used to solve complex problems in the whole domain.
  
-Content analysis in the structural ​learning theory attempts to identify components crucial for solving the given problem and is based on the procedure called //​structural analysis//. Structural analysis is performed in the following steps:+Structural ​learning theory ​further ​attempts to identify components crucial for solving the given problem and is based on the procedure called //​structural analysis//. Structural analysis is performed in the following steps:
  
-  -  The first step is to identify problem domain in terms +  - The first step is to identify problem domain ​inputs and outputs, or even only outputs (representative problems). 
 +  - Rules should be defined and explained on each representative problem. Problem domain can be both well- and ill-defined((An ill-defined domain is one in which rules are quite simple, yet there is no direct complete solution like chess, or poetry writing.)). In case of an ill-defined domain, it should be divided into well-defined sub-domains which can generate at least one solution rule. 
 +  - Each solution rule should be converted into a new higher-order problem and new higher-order rules for solving them. 
 +  - Redundant rules should be eliminated and the whole process repeated until simple enough rules are reached.
  
 +An important part of the theory is also **prior knowledge (rules)** of the learner, that will **enable construction of new rules**. This knowledge can be examined by instructor, that can be both human or artificial.
  
 +===== What is the practical meaning of structural learning theory? =====
  
 +An example of application of structural learning on learning how to subtract:​((Suggested by Scandura in [[http://​books.google.hr/​books?​id=qlF9AAAAMAAJ&​q=Problem+Solving:​+A+Structural/​Process+Approach+with+Instructional+Applications&​dq=Problem+Solving:​+A+Structural/​Process+Approach+with+Instructional+Applications&​hl=hr&​ei=GpuATeSrMs7esgbhvfT4Bg&​sa=X&​oi=book_result&​ct=result&​resnum=2&​ved=0CCwQ6AEwAQ|Scandura,​ J.M. Problem Solving: A Structural/​Process Approach with Instructional Applications. NY: Academic Press. 1977.]]. Cited in [[http://​tip.psychology.org/​scandura.html|TIP:​ Structural Learning Theory (J. Scandura)]]. Retrieved March 16, 2011.)) ​
  
-  - A hierarchy ​of rules should be defined for the domain. Problem domain can be both welland ill-defined((An ill-defined domain is one in which rules are quite simple, yet there is no direct complete solution like chess, or poetry writing.)). In case of an ill-defined domain, it should ​be divided into well-defined sub-domains which can generate at least one rule. +  - Select a representative sample ​of subtraction problems such as 9-5, 248-13, or 801-302. 
- +  - Identify the minimal capabilities ​of the learners: ​be able to recognize the digits 0-9, minus sign, column and rowsThen identify rules for solving each of the subtraction problems. For example, one of the rules can be that if the last digit of the minuend is smaller than a corresponding digit of the subtrahendthe next left digit in minuend is decremented by one. 
-Domain definition is followed by **construction ​of hierarchy ​of rules** for well-defined domains. Rules should ​be explained on prototype problemsbut can also leave some **gaps** ​in problem solving procedure, which **are then converted into higher-order ​problems** containing gap rules. ​Higher-order rules are then used to fill the gapbut can also validate lower level rules+  - Identify ​higher-order rules and eliminate other rules they subsumeFor subtraction this means the rule mentioned under (2) should be generalized for any digit of the minuend and corresponding digit of the subtrahendnot just the last one
- +  - Reconsider ​the resulting ​rules from (3and generalize them to account for all problems within the domain. In the case of subtraction we could generalize ​the problem to subtraction ​of numbers in different bases.
-An important part of the theory is also **prior knowledge (rules)** of the learner, that will **enable construction ​of new rules**. This knowledge can be examined by instructor, that can be both human or artificial.+
  
 Structural learning theory'​s applications have been made in **mathematics** and **language learning**. Structural learning theory'​s applications have been made in **mathematics** and **language learning**.
- 
- 
-===== What is the practical meaning of structural learning theory? ===== 
- 
  
 ===== Criticisms ===== ===== Criticisms =====
Line 47: Line 50:
 ===== Keywords and most important names ===== ===== Keywords and most important names =====
  
 +  * **Structural learning theory**, **rules**, **domain**, **range**, **procedures**
 +  * [[http://​www.scandura.com/​|Joseph Scandura]]
  
 ===== Bibliography ===== ===== Bibliography =====
 +
 +[[http://​www.scandura.com/​Articles/​172-SLT%20Current%20Status%20and%20New%20Perspectives.pdf|Scandura,​ J. M. Structural Learning Theory: Current Status and New Perspectives. Instructional Science 29, no. 4 : 311–336. 2001.]]
  
 [[http://​web.cortland.edu/​frieda/​id/​IDtheories/​4.html|Instructional Design Theory Database Project: Structural Learning Theory.]] Retrieved March 15, 2011. [[http://​web.cortland.edu/​frieda/​id/​IDtheories/​4.html|Instructional Design Theory Database Project: Structural Learning Theory.]] Retrieved March 15, 2011.
  
 [[http://​www.odu.edu/​educ/​roverbau/​Class_Websites/​761_Spring_04/​Assets/​course_docs/​ID_Theory_Reps_Sp04/​Scandura_Chapman.pdf|Scandura,​ J. M. Structural learning theory. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status: p215–245. 1984.]] [[http://​www.odu.edu/​educ/​roverbau/​Class_Websites/​761_Spring_04/​Assets/​course_docs/​ID_Theory_Reps_Sp04/​Scandura_Chapman.pdf|Scandura,​ J. M. Structural learning theory. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status: p215–245. 1984.]]
 +
 +[[http://​tip.psychology.org/​scandura.html|TIP:​ Structural Learning Theory (J. Scandura).]] Retrieved March 16, 2011.
 +
  
 ===== Read more ===== ===== Read more =====
  
-Reigeluth, Charles M. Instructional-design Theories and Models: An overview of their current status. Routledge, 1983.+[[http://​books.google.com/​books?​id=AbJc4Kg6XQoC|Reigeluth, Charles M. Instructional-design Theories and Models: An overview of their current status. Routledge, 1983.]] 
 + 
 +[[http://​books.google.com/​books?​id=pCoEAQAAIAAJ|Scandura,​ J.M. & Scandura, A. Structural Learning and Concrete Operations: An Approach to Piagetian Conservation. NY: Praeger. 1980.]] 
 + 
 +[[http://​books.google.com/​books?​id=O43KPQAACAAJ|Scandura,​ J.M. Structural Learning I: Theory and Research. London: Gordon & Breach. 1973.]] 
 + 
 +[[http://​www.amazon.com/​dp/​0677151101|Scandura,​ J.M. Structural Learning II: Issues and Approaches. London: Gordon & Breach. 1976.]]
instructional_design/structural_learning.1300268925.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/06/19 17:49 (external edit)