learning_theories:dual_coding_theory
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
learning_theories:dual_coding_theory [2011/06/27 10:41] jpetrovic [Bibliography] |
learning_theories:dual_coding_theory [2011/06/27 13:29] jpetrovic [Criticisms] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| ===== Criticisms ===== | ===== Criticisms ===== | ||
| + | Common criticisms of dual coding theory suggest that there is no need for two representational systems, since both verbal and non-verbal stimuli are processed in working memory, turned to semantic elements or propositions and are stored in long-term memory. This assumption is sometimes also known as the //single-coding theory//.(([[http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?filename=0&article=1518&context=theses&type=additional&sei-redir=1#search=%22Animating%20Mind%3A%20An%20Analysis%20Animation%20as%20Representational%20Mode%20Learning%22|Hewson, Lindsay. Animating the Mind: An Analysis of Animation as A Representational Mode for Learning. University of Wollongong, 2002.]])) | ||
| ===== Keywords and most important names ===== | ===== Keywords and most important names ===== | ||
| + | * [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Paivio|Allan Pavio]] | ||
| + | * **Dual coding theory**, **verbal and non-verbal system**, **logogen**, **imagen**, **referential connections**, **associative connections** | ||
| ===== Bibliography ===== | ===== Bibliography ===== | ||
learning_theories/dual_coding_theory.txt · Last modified: 2023/06/19 18:03 (external edit)
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
