User Tools

Site Tools


instructional_design:discovery_learning

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
instructional_design:discovery_learning [2014/01/06 22:57]
amaricic [Kritike]
instructional_design:discovery_learning [2014/01/06 22:58]
amaricic [Kritike]
Line 41: Line 41:
  
 =====Kritike===== =====Kritike=====
-Učenje otkrivanjem u zadnje vrijeme je predmetom brojnih kritika [[hr:​learning_paradigms:​constructivism&#​criticisms|vidi:kritike konstruktivizma]],​ pri čemu sve više istraživanja pokazuje:+Učenje otkrivanjem u zadnje vrijeme je predmetom brojnih kritika ​(vidi:[[hr:​learning_paradigms:​constructivism&#​criticisms|kritike konstruktivizma]]), pri čemu sve više istraživanja pokazuje:
   * **neefikasnost** ​ učenja isključivo otkrivanjem,​ posebno za početnike, i   * **neefikasnost** ​ učenja isključivo otkrivanjem,​ posebno za početnike, i
   * snažne pozitivne učinke vođene nastave i praktičnih primjera, uglavnom isključenih iz učenja putem otkrivanja(([[http://​www.katharinenewman.com/​Research/​Desktop/​amp-59-1-14.pdf|Mayer,​ R. E. Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning?. American Psychologist 59, no. 1: 14. 2004.]]))(([[http://​www.google.hr/​url?​sa=t&​source=web&​cd=1&​ved=0CBoQFjAA&​url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.169.8810%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&​rct=j&​q=Why%20minimal%20guidance%20during%20instruction%20does%20not%20work&​ei=yvSuTaKGCoySOuetze4B&​usg=AFQjCNGIE4wsl4Fg5fVtGlt3UdZOoLrP2A&​cad=rja|Kirschner,​ P. A, J. Sweller, and R. E Clark. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist,​ discovery, problem-based,​ experiential,​ and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist 41, no. 2: 75–86. 2006.))(([[http://​www.cogtech.usc.edu/​publications/​sweller_kirschner_clark_reply_ep07.pdf|Sweller,​ J., P. A Kirschner, and R. E Clark. Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist 42, no. 2: 115–121. 2007.]]))(([[http://​www.scopus.com/​record/​display.url?​eid=2-s2.0-79951777254&​origin=resultslist&​sort=cp-t&​src=s&​imp=t&​sid=Ug84tfmOFqClrogsKqiEWMQ%3a50&​sot=inw&​sdt=a&​sl=42&​s=AU-ID%28%22Tenenbaum%2c+Harriet+R.%22+35367227500%29&​relpos=3&​relpos=3&​searchTerm=AU-ID%28\|Alfieri,​ Louis, Patricia J. Brooks, Naomi J. Aldrich, and Harriet R. Tenenbaum. Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning? Journal of Educational Psychology 103, no. 1: 1-18. February 2011.]]))(([[http://​www.sciencedirect.com/​science?​_ob=MImg&​_imagekey=B6VDC-4V6YSYJ-1-1&​_cdi=5979&​_user=3875467&​_pii=S0747563208002161&​_origin=gateway&​_coverDate=03%2F31%2F2009&​_sk=999749997&​view=c&​wchp=dGLbVlW-zSkzS&​md5=c56371507f94d74cb7effdbb3f2aec57&​ie=/​sdarticle.pdf|Schwonke,​ Rolf, Alexander Renkl, Carmen Krieg, Jörg Wittwer, Vincent Aleven, and Ron Salden. The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions. Computers in Human Behavior 25, no. 2: 258-266. March 2009.]])). ​   * snažne pozitivne učinke vođene nastave i praktičnih primjera, uglavnom isključenih iz učenja putem otkrivanja(([[http://​www.katharinenewman.com/​Research/​Desktop/​amp-59-1-14.pdf|Mayer,​ R. E. Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning?. American Psychologist 59, no. 1: 14. 2004.]]))(([[http://​www.google.hr/​url?​sa=t&​source=web&​cd=1&​ved=0CBoQFjAA&​url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.169.8810%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&​rct=j&​q=Why%20minimal%20guidance%20during%20instruction%20does%20not%20work&​ei=yvSuTaKGCoySOuetze4B&​usg=AFQjCNGIE4wsl4Fg5fVtGlt3UdZOoLrP2A&​cad=rja|Kirschner,​ P. A, J. Sweller, and R. E Clark. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist,​ discovery, problem-based,​ experiential,​ and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist 41, no. 2: 75–86. 2006.))(([[http://​www.cogtech.usc.edu/​publications/​sweller_kirschner_clark_reply_ep07.pdf|Sweller,​ J., P. A Kirschner, and R. E Clark. Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist 42, no. 2: 115–121. 2007.]]))(([[http://​www.scopus.com/​record/​display.url?​eid=2-s2.0-79951777254&​origin=resultslist&​sort=cp-t&​src=s&​imp=t&​sid=Ug84tfmOFqClrogsKqiEWMQ%3a50&​sot=inw&​sdt=a&​sl=42&​s=AU-ID%28%22Tenenbaum%2c+Harriet+R.%22+35367227500%29&​relpos=3&​relpos=3&​searchTerm=AU-ID%28\|Alfieri,​ Louis, Patricia J. Brooks, Naomi J. Aldrich, and Harriet R. Tenenbaum. Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning? Journal of Educational Psychology 103, no. 1: 1-18. February 2011.]]))(([[http://​www.sciencedirect.com/​science?​_ob=MImg&​_imagekey=B6VDC-4V6YSYJ-1-1&​_cdi=5979&​_user=3875467&​_pii=S0747563208002161&​_origin=gateway&​_coverDate=03%2F31%2F2009&​_sk=999749997&​view=c&​wchp=dGLbVlW-zSkzS&​md5=c56371507f94d74cb7effdbb3f2aec57&​ie=/​sdarticle.pdf|Schwonke,​ Rolf, Alexander Renkl, Carmen Krieg, Jörg Wittwer, Vincent Aleven, and Ron Salden. The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions. Computers in Human Behavior 25, no. 2: 258-266. March 2009.]])). ​
instructional_design/discovery_learning.txt · Last modified: 2023/06/19 18:03 (external edit)