knowledge_assessment:q-matrix
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
knowledge_assessment:q-matrix [2014/01/03 16:24] jpetrovic [Literature] |
knowledge_assessment:q-matrix [2014/01/03 16:24] jpetrovic [Factor analysis] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| Factor analysis can be considered as an alternative to q-matrices. Concepts are in that case automatically determined using covariance matrix. Number of concepts should be smaller than number of questions. Still, this methos has proven to be less fault tollerant. Still, when forming a correlation matrix, we lose individual student data in favor of calculating average relationships between questions. The q-matrix method is optimized to assign each student the most appropriate knowledge state, using all available response data for each student. | Factor analysis can be considered as an alternative to q-matrices. Concepts are in that case automatically determined using covariance matrix. Number of concepts should be smaller than number of questions. Still, this methos has proven to be less fault tollerant. Still, when forming a correlation matrix, we lose individual student data in favor of calculating average relationships between questions. The q-matrix method is optimized to assign each student the most appropriate knowledge state, using all available response data for each student. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ((see Ham85 for a discussion of item-response theory)) | ||
| - | |||
knowledge_assessment/q-matrix.txt ยท Last modified: 2023/06/19 18:03 (external edit)
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
