learning_theories:dual_coding_theory
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
learning_theories:dual_coding_theory [2011/06/27 11:34] jpetrovic [Criticisms] |
learning_theories:dual_coding_theory [2011/06/27 13:31] jpetrovic [General] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ===== General ===== | ===== General ===== | ||
| - | Dual coding is a theory of cognition introduced by [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Paivio|Allan Pavio]] in late 1960s. This theory suggests that there are **two distinct subsystems** contributing to cognition: one is specialized **for language** and verbal information, and the other **for images** and non-verbal information. According to Pavio, | + | Dual coding is a theory of cognition introduced by [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Paivio|Allan Paivio]] in late 1960s. This theory suggests that there are **two distinct subsystems** contributing to cognition: one is specialized **for language** and verbal information, and the other **for images** and non-verbal information. According to Pavio, |
| * "//Human cognition is unique in that it has become specialized for dealing simultaneously with language and with nonverbal objects and events.//"(([[http://expresslanka-ebook.blogspot.com/2011/02/mental-representations-dual-coding.html|Paivio, Allan. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press, 1990, p53.]])) | * "//Human cognition is unique in that it has become specialized for dealing simultaneously with language and with nonverbal objects and events.//"(([[http://expresslanka-ebook.blogspot.com/2011/02/mental-representations-dual-coding.html|Paivio, Allan. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press, 1990, p53.]])) | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| ===== Criticisms ===== | ===== Criticisms ===== | ||
| - | Common criticisms of dual coding theory suggest that there is no need for two representational systems, since both verbal and non-verbal stimuli are processed in working memory, turned to semantic elements or propositions and are stored in long-term memory. This assumption is sometimes also known as the //single-coding theory//.(()) | + | Common criticisms of dual coding theory suggest that there is no need for two representational systems, since both verbal and non-verbal stimuli are processed in working memory, turned to semantic elements or propositions and are stored in long-term memory. This assumption is sometimes also known as the //single-coding theory//.(([[http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?filename=0&article=1518&context=theses&type=additional&sei-redir=1#search=%22Animating%20Mind%3A%20An%20Analysis%20Animation%20as%20Representational%20Mode%20Learning%22|Hewson, Lindsay. Animating the Mind: An Analysis of Animation as A Representational Mode for Learning. University of Wollongong, 2002.]])) |
| ===== Keywords and most important names ===== | ===== Keywords and most important names ===== | ||
learning_theories/dual_coding_theory.txt ยท Last modified: 2023/06/19 18:03 (external edit)
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
