User Tools

Site Tools


learning_theories:gestalt_psychology

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
learning_theories:gestalt_psychology [2011/02/28 15:34]
jpetrovic [Read more]
learning_theories:gestalt_psychology [2023/06/19 18:03] (current)
Line 4: Line 4:
 ===== General ===== ===== General =====
  
-[[:​glossary#​gestalt|Gestalt]] psychology was first introduced in 1912 by [[http://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Max_Wertheimer|Max Wertheimer]],​ a German psychologist, ​as he published a paper on optical illusion called //apparent motion//. In the paper he analyzed the illusion when a series of static images is perceived as movement, just like films. The assumption that **whole is more than just sum of its parts** is the basic principle of gestalt psychology. ​+[[:​glossary#​gestalt|Gestalt]] psychology was first introduced in 1912 by [[http://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Max_Wertheimer|Max Wertheimer]](([[http://​webspace.ship.edu/​cgboer/​gestalt.html|Boeree,​ George. Gestalt Psychology.]])), a German psychologist, ​when he published a paper on optical illusion called //apparent motion//. In the paper he analyzed the illusion ​occurring ​when a series of static images is perceived as movement, just like films. The assumption that **whole is more than just sum of its parts** is the basic principle of gestalt psychology. ​
 ===== What is gestalt psychology? ===== ===== What is gestalt psychology? =====
  
-Gestalt theory was introduced as a **contrast to** at the time dominant **[[:​glossary#​structuralism|structuralism]]**,​ which claimed that complex perceptions could be understood through breaking them into smaller elementary parts of experience, like splitting graphical forms into sets of dots or melody into sequence of sounds. Gestaltists **attacked this theory**: same melody can be recognized if transposed into another key and perception of a rectangle can be achieved through other forms than four lines. The idea of Wertheimer was that that the ability to **perceive objects** was an **ability of the nervous system**, which tends to **group together objects** that are **nearby**, similar, form **smooth lines**, form most of the **shape we can recognize**. These are the four Wertheimer'​s **//laws of grouping//​**:​+Gestalt theory was introduced as a **contrast to** at the time dominant **[[:​glossary#​structuralism|structuralism]]**,​ which claimed that complex perceptions could be understood through breaking them into smaller elementary parts of experience, like splitting graphical forms into sets of dots or melody into sequence of sounds. Gestaltists **attacked this theory**: same melody can be recognized if transposed into another key and perception of a rectangle can be achieved through other forms than four lines. The idea of Wertheimer was that the ability to **perceive objects** was an **ability of the nervous system**, which tends to **group together objects** that are **nearby**, similar, form **smooth lines**, form most of the **shape we can recognize**. These are the four Wertheimer'​s **//laws of grouping//​**:​
  
     * **Similarity** - objects with **similar properties** (like shape or color) are grouped together     * **Similarity** - objects with **similar properties** (like shape or color) are grouped together
Line 14: Line 14:
     * **Closure** - if **enough of the shape** is presented, the whole is perceived by filling in the missing information     * **Closure** - if **enough of the shape** is presented, the whole is perceived by filling in the missing information
  
-Danish psychologist [[http://​www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/​jsource/​judaica/​ejud_0002_0017_0_17126.html|Edgar Rubin]] in 1921 introduced another important gestalt aspect of organization (although he wasn't a gestaltist himself), the **//​figure-ground//​** perception. ​He suggested that even a group of connected objects can mentally be interpreted as an **object** (figure) or **surface behind** it (ground) and formulated conditions describing when would which of that be the case.+Danish psychologist [[http://​www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/​jsource/​judaica/​ejud_0002_0017_0_17126.html|Edgar Rubin]] in 1921 introduced another important gestalt aspect of organization (although he wasn't a gestaltist himself), the **//​figure-ground//​** perception. ​Rubin suggested that a group of connected objects can mentally be interpreted as an **object** (figure) or **surface behind** it (ground) and formulated conditions describing when would which of that be the case.
  
-The final Gestalt concept is the principle of //​Prägnanz//,​ which claims that when visual stimulus ​is ambiguous ​(for example a partly hidden figure), people tend to **organize** it as **simple**, **regular** and **symmetric** as much as the conditions (information retrieved by the retina in the eye) allow. Gestaltists explained this through an idea of brains electric fields which reached an minimal energy state, but this theory is today mostly rejected.+The final Gestalt concept is the principle of //​Prägnanz//,​ which claims that when visual stimulus ​can be interpreted in more ways (for example a partly hidden figure), people tend to **organize** it as **simple**, **regular** and **symmetric** as much as the conditions (information retrieved by the retina in the eye) allow. Gestaltists explained this through an idea of brains electric fields which reached an minimal energy state, but this theory is today mostly rejected.
  
 |  {{:​images:​similarity.gif|}} ​ |  {{:​images:​prox.gif|}} ​ |  {{:​images:​continuation.gif|}} ​ | |  {{:​images:​similarity.gif|}} ​ |  {{:​images:​prox.gif|}} ​ |  {{:​images:​continuation.gif|}} ​ |
 |  1. **Similarity**((Image borrowed from: [[http://​graphicdesign.spokanefalls.edu/​tutorials/​process/​gestaltprinciples/​gestaltprinc.htm|Spokane Falls Community College - Gestalt Principles]])) - similar objects are formed together to form the sun around eagles head  |  2. **Proximity**((Image borrowed from: [[http://​graphicdesign.spokanefalls.edu/​tutorials/​process/​gestaltprinciples/​gestaltprinc.htm|Spokane Falls Community College - Gestalt Principles]])) - when close, nine rectangles are grouped as one object, when not, they are perceived as different objects ​ |  3. **Continuation**((Image borrowed from: [[http://​graphicdesign.spokanefalls.edu/​tutorials/​process/​gestaltprinciples/​gestaltprinc.htm|Spokane Falls Community College - Gestalt Principles]])) - a smooth line is perceived as continuous ​ | |  1. **Similarity**((Image borrowed from: [[http://​graphicdesign.spokanefalls.edu/​tutorials/​process/​gestaltprinciples/​gestaltprinc.htm|Spokane Falls Community College - Gestalt Principles]])) - similar objects are formed together to form the sun around eagles head  |  2. **Proximity**((Image borrowed from: [[http://​graphicdesign.spokanefalls.edu/​tutorials/​process/​gestaltprinciples/​gestaltprinc.htm|Spokane Falls Community College - Gestalt Principles]])) - when close, nine rectangles are grouped as one object, when not, they are perceived as different objects ​ |  3. **Continuation**((Image borrowed from: [[http://​graphicdesign.spokanefalls.edu/​tutorials/​process/​gestaltprinciples/​gestaltprinc.htm|Spokane Falls Community College - Gestalt Principles]])) - a smooth line is perceived as continuous ​ |
 |  {{:​images:​closure.gif|}} ​ |  {{:​images:​praganz.gif|}} ​ |  {{:​images:​vase.png|}} ​ | |  {{:​images:​closure.gif|}} ​ |  {{:​images:​praganz.gif|}} ​ |  {{:​images:​vase.png|}} ​ |
-|  4. **Closure**((Image borrowed from: [[http://​graphicdesign.spokanefalls.edu/​tutorials/​process/​gestaltprinciples/​gestaltprinc.htm|Spokane Falls Community College - Gestalt Principles]])) - enough of the shape is present to mentally complete the image of panda  |   ​**Prägnanz**((Image borrowed from: [[http://​kobi.nat.uni-magdeburg.de/​uploads/​Courses/​RockPalmer1990.pdf|Rock,​ I. and Palmer, S. The Legacy of Gestalt Psychology. Scientific American, 263(6), p48-61. 1990.]])) - an ambiguous pattern (1) is recognized as as few simple shapes as possible (circle and rectangle over-leaping in 2) and not complex shapes (3,4)  |  **Figure-ground perception**:​ The Rubin goblet((Image borrowed from: [[http://​www.psywww.com/​intropsych/​ch04_senses/​gestalt_psychology.html|Psych Web - Gestalt Psychology]])) - if black region is recognized as foreground then two faces are recognized, if white region is recognized as foreground then a goblet is recognized, but the two can never be recognized simultaneously ​ |+|  4. **Closure**((Image borrowed from: [[http://​graphicdesign.spokanefalls.edu/​tutorials/​process/​gestaltprinciples/​gestaltprinc.htm|Spokane Falls Community College - Gestalt Principles]])) - enough of the shape is present to mentally complete the image of panda  |   ​**Prägnanz**((Image borrowed from: [[http://​kobi.nat.uni-magdeburg.de/​uploads/​Courses/​RockPalmer1990.pdf|Rock,​ I. and Palmer, S. The Legacy of Gestalt Psychology. Scientific American, 263(6), p48-61. 1990.]])) - an ambiguous pattern (1) is recognized as as few simple shapes as possible (circle and rectangle over-leaping in 2) and not complex shapes (3,4)  |  **Figure-ground perception**:​ The Rubin goblet((Image borrowed from: [[http://​www.psywww.com/​intropsych/​ch04_senses/​gestalt_psychology.html|Psych Web - Gestalt Psychology]])) - if black region is recognized as foreground then two faces are recognized, if white region is recognized as foreground then a goblet is recognized, but the two can never be recognized simultaneously ​ |
  
-Gestaltist views on learning and problem-solving were opposed to at the time dominant pre-behaviorist and behaviorist views. Wertheimer emphasized importance of seeing the **whole structure of the problem**. Köhler performed experiments with animals learning through trial and error sessions. In his most famous example of insight learning in animals he gave a chimp named Sultan sticks that could be assembled ​like fishing pole and placed a banana outside his cage out of his reach. Sultan, after considering the situation, suddenly jumped, assembled the poles, and reached the banana. Discovery of correct solution to the problem was followed by insight occurrence. This presents **//​[[:​glossary#​insightful_learning|insightful learning]]//​**,​ which has following properties(([[http://​fac.hsu.edu/​ahmada/​3%20Courses/​2%20Learning/​Learning%20Notes/​10%20Gestalt%20Theory.pdf|Ahmad,​ A. Gestalt School on Learning. Ppt presentation.]])):​+Gestaltist views on learning and problem-solving were opposed to at the time dominant pre-behaviorist and behaviorist views. Wertheimer emphasized importance of seeing the **whole structure of the problem**. Köhler performed experiments with animals learning through trial and error sessions. In his most famous example of insight learning in animals he gave a chimp named Sultan sticks that could be assembled ​together to form longer one and placed a banana outside his cage out of his reach. Sultan, after considering the situation, suddenly jumped, assembled the sticks, and reached the banana. Discovery of correct solution to the problem was followed by insight occurrence. This presents **//​[[:​glossary#​insightful_learning|insightful learning]]//​**,​ which has following properties(([[http://​fac.hsu.edu/​ahmada/​3%20Courses/​2%20Learning/​Learning%20Notes/​10%20Gestalt%20Theory.pdf|Ahmad,​ A. Gestalt School on Learning. Ppt presentation.]])):​
  
   * Transition from pre-solution to solution is sudden and complete.   * Transition from pre-solution to solution is sudden and complete.
Line 34: Line 34:
 Wertheimer suggested usage of gestalt principles in education. He contrasted **productive thinking** from **rote learning**, which occurs **without understanding**. Humans, unlike animals, can learn not only through conditioning or trial and error but also through **explanations** through **changing** their **cognitive structure** to achieve cognitive structure of the explainer, yet this should not be turned into rote learning. Problem-solving presents learning with understanding using gestalt principles. This learning is remembered for a long time, and can be applied to other situations. Gestaltism therefore suggests that learners should be **encouraged to discover** whole nature or relationships between elements of a problem, but also to **exclude implicit assumptions** that might be incorrect. Since human mind functions in accordance with the mentioned principles, **instructional design** should be **based on** **proximity**,​ **closure**,​ **similarity** and **simplicity**. ​ Wertheimer suggested usage of gestalt principles in education. He contrasted **productive thinking** from **rote learning**, which occurs **without understanding**. Humans, unlike animals, can learn not only through conditioning or trial and error but also through **explanations** through **changing** their **cognitive structure** to achieve cognitive structure of the explainer, yet this should not be turned into rote learning. Problem-solving presents learning with understanding using gestalt principles. This learning is remembered for a long time, and can be applied to other situations. Gestaltism therefore suggests that learners should be **encouraged to discover** whole nature or relationships between elements of a problem, but also to **exclude implicit assumptions** that might be incorrect. Since human mind functions in accordance with the mentioned principles, **instructional design** should be **based on** **proximity**,​ **closure**,​ **similarity** and **simplicity**. ​
  
-A simple example of productive thinking was given in an experiment where a five years old girl was presented with a complex geometry problem: determining area of a parallelogram. She used a pair of scissors to cut off a triangle from one end, placed it at the opposite side, turning the parallelogram into a rectangle. +Application of gestalt laws has been suggested for **concept and knowledge maps** design (considering colors, shapes and groupings), where it has provided **positive results**(([[http://​heldref-publications.metapress.com/​app/​home/​contribution.asp?​referrer=parent&​backto=issue,​1,​6;​journal,​49,​53;​linkingpublicationresults,​1:​119931,​1|Wallace,​ D., Wandell, S., Ware, A. and Dansereau D. The Effect of Knowledge Maps That Incorporate Gestalt Principles on Learning. The Journal of Experimental Education 67, no. 1: 5-16. 1998.]])).  ​
- +
-Application of gestalt laws has been suggested for **[[instructional_design:​mental_models|mental models]]** design (considering colors, shapes and groupings), where it has provided **positive results**(([[http://​heldref-publications.metapress.com/​app/​home/​contribution.asp?​referrer=parent&​backto=issue,​1,​6;​journal,​49,​53;​linkingpublicationresults,​1:​119931,​1|Wallace,​ D., Wandell, S., Ware, A. and Dansereau D. The Effect of Knowledge Maps That Incorporate Gestalt Principles on Learning. The Journal of Experimental Education 67, no. 1: 5-16. 1998.]])).  ​ +
- +
-Gestalt views have inspired later [[learning_paradigms:​cognitivism#​learning_theories|cognitivist theories]].+
  
  
Line 50: Line 46:
   * **denying** the basic scientific approach of understanding a **whole as a set of its parts**.   * **denying** the basic scientific approach of understanding a **whole as a set of its parts**.
  
-Gestalt theory has inspired psychologist like [[http://​www.muskingum.edu/​~psych/​psycweb/​history/​lewin.htm|Kurt Lewin]] or [[http://​www.acsu.buffalo.edu/​~duchan/​history_subpages/​kurtgoldstein.html|Kurt Goldstein]],​ who introduced it in other aspects of psychology.+Gestalt theory has inspired psychologist like [[http://​www.muskingum.edu/​~psych/​psycweb/​history/​lewin.htm|Kurt Lewin]] or [[http://​www.acsu.buffalo.edu/​~duchan/​history_subpages/​kurtgoldstein.html|Kurt Goldstein]],​ who introduced it in other aspects of psychology. Gestalt views also inspired later [[learning_paradigms:​cognitivism#​learning_theories|cognitivist theories]].
  
  
Line 63: Line 59:
 [[http://​kobi.nat.uni-magdeburg.de/​uploads/​Courses/​RockPalmer1990.pdf|Rock,​ I. and Palmer, S. The Legacy of Gestalt Psychology. Scientific American, 263(6), p48-61. 1990.]] [[http://​kobi.nat.uni-magdeburg.de/​uploads/​Courses/​RockPalmer1990.pdf|Rock,​ I. and Palmer, S. The Legacy of Gestalt Psychology. Scientific American, 263(6), p48-61. 1990.]]
  
-[[http://​tip.psychology.org/​wertheim.html|TIP:​ Theories. Gestalt Theory (Wertheimer).]]+[[http://​tip.psychology.org/​wertheim.html|TIP:​ Theories. Gestalt Theory (Wertheimer).]] ​Retrieved March 21, 2011.
  
-[[http://​webspace.ship.edu/​cgboer/​genpsyperception.html|Boeree,​ G. General Psychology - Perception and Interaction.]]+[[http://​webspace.ship.edu/​cgboer/​genpsyperception.html|Boeree,​ G. General Psychology - Perception and Interaction.]] ​Retrieved March 21, 2011.
  
 ===== Read more ===== ===== Read more =====
  
-[[http://​psychclassics.yorku.ca/​Koffka/​Perception/​perception.htm|Koffka,​ K. Perception: An introduction to the Gestalt-theorie. Psychological Bulletin, 19, 531-585. 1922.]]+[[http://​books.google.hr/​books?​id=cLnqI3dvi4kC|Koffka,​ Kurt. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Routledge, 1999.]] 
 + 
 +[[http://​psychclassics.yorku.ca/​Koffka/​Perception/​perception.htm|Koffka,​ K. Perception: An introduction to the Gestalt-theory. Psychological Bulletin, 19, 531-585. 1922.]]
  
 [[http://​psychclassics.yorku.ca/​Wertheimer/​Forms/​forms.htm|Wertheimer,​ M. Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms. Translation published in Ellis, W. A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71-88). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1938.]] [[http://​psychclassics.yorku.ca/​Wertheimer/​Forms/​forms.htm|Wertheimer,​ M. Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms. Translation published in Ellis, W. A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71-88). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1938.]]
  
 Wertheimer, M. A source book of Gestalt psychology. Hartcourt, Brace and Co, New York, 1938. Wertheimer, M. A source book of Gestalt psychology. Hartcourt, Brace and Co, New York, 1938.
 +
 +[[http://​search.ebscohost.com/​login.aspx?​direct=true&​db=pdh&​AN=2011-03201-004&​site=ehost-live| Weibler J, Rohn-Endres S. Learning conversation and shared network leadership: Development,​ Gestalt, and consequences. Journal Of Personnel Psychology,​9(4),​181-194. 2010.]]
 +
 +[[http://​search.ebscohost.com/​login.aspx?​direct=true&​db=mnh&​AN=14511516&​site=ehost-live| Prodöhl C, Würtz R, von der Malsburg C. Learning the Gestalt rule of collinearity from object motion. Neural Computation,​ 15(8), 1865-1896. 2003.]]
learning_theories/gestalt_psychology.1298903676.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/06/19 17:49 (external edit)