Discovery learning is a learning model introduced in 1960s by one of the founders on constructivist theory, Jerome Bruner, but closely related to works of Jean Piaget (see: Stage Theory of Cognitive Development), Lev Vygotsky (see: Social Development Theory), John Dewey and Seymour Papert and later further developed by other researchers. Bruner's theory is considered to be fully constructivist in nature. Discovery learning according to him is a inquiry-based instructional approach in which the learner builds new knowledge from prior knowledge and active experience.

In contrast to classical teaching methods in which the learner is usually passive and expected to assimilate the knowledge presented by the teacher¹⁾, discovery learning offers a learner-centered approach in which the learner discovers new knowledge through active, hand-on experiences²⁾ and construct new concepts based on his existing knowledge. This kind of learning is oriented on the process of learning, rather then on its content and information. According to Bruner,

• “practice in discovering for oneself teaches one to acquire information in a way that makes that information more readily viable in problem solving.”³⁾

Another important aspect of discovery learning is failure, which is viewed as an important element of learning to the extent that learner hasn't really learned anything if he hasn't failed during the learning process.

Later in his career Bruner adopted a more social and political view of learning and language acquisition influenced by Lev Vigotsky's social development theory.

Main attributes of discovery learning, as described by Bicknell-Holmes and Hoffman⁴⁾ are:

• exploring and problem solving, which stimulate learners to actively approach to creation, acquisition and generalization of new knowledge instead of passively being exposed to lectures and practice,
• taking responsibility for learning in terms oft he ability of learners to choose their own learning pace, and
• building new knowledge from the existing.

The characteristics in which discovery learning differs from clasical learning are⁵⁾:

• active rather than passive learning,
• learning is process-oriented rather than content-oriented,
• failure is important,
• feedback is necessary, and
• understanding is deeper.

Bruner’s constructivistic principles of discovery learning claim that instruction must⁶⁾:

• provide students with experiences and contexts that make them willing and able to learn (readiness),
• be structured in a spiral manner so that the student keeps developing learned concepts in more and more details, and
• be designed to facilitate extrapolation that enables student going beyond the information given.

The role of the teacher in such instructional process can be either to provide students with information when necessary (guided discovery) or not provide them with information at all (unguided discovery).

These principles offering an idea of what instructional process should look like were implemented in several mostly very similar architectures of discovery-based learning:

• Case-Based Learning
• Incidental Learning
• Simulation-Based Learning
• Goal Based Scenarios
• Problem-Based Learning

Discovery learning has been subjected to many criticisms lately (see: criticisms of constructivism), with more and more studies showing:

• inefficiency of pure discovery learning, especially for novice learners, and
• strong positive effects of guided instruction and worked examples, mostly excluded from learning by discovery^7)8)9)10).

• “In summary, learners encounter problems with all processes characteristic of discovery learning such as stating hypotheses, designing experiments, interpreting data and regulating the learning process (monitoring and planning).”¹¹⁾

Still, this debate is ongoing as various researchers still find that guided discovery can result in better learning than explicit instruction¹²⁾.

• Jerome Bruner
• discovery learning, discovery-based learning, guided discovery, exploring

Bicknell-Holmes, Tracy, and Paul Seth Hoffman. Elicit, engage, experience, explore: discovery learning in library instruction. Reference Services Review 28, no. 4: 313-322. 2000.

Cooper, S. Theories of Learning in Educational Psychology: Jerome Bruner. Constructivism & Discovery Learning. Retrieved June 6, 2011.

Discovery Learning (Bruner) at Learning Theories. Retrieved June 2, 2011.

Castronova, J. Discovery learning for the 21st century: what is it and how does it compare to traditional learning in effectiveness in the 21st century. Literature Reviews, Action Research Exchange (ARE 1, no. 2). 2002.

Bruner, J. Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1966.

Bruner, J. The Culture of Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1996.

Bruner, J. On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1967.

Bruner, J. The Relevance of Education. Norton, 1971.